Use the comparison tool below to compare the top Service Mesh on the market. You can filter results by user reviews, pricing, features, platform, region, support options, integrations, and more.
Kong
$250 per monthNetwork Service Mesh
FreeHashiCorp
Huawei Cloud
$0.03 per hour-instanceServiceComb
FreeSolo.io
Netmaker
Traefik Labs
Amazon Web Services
FreeEnvoy Proxy
Kiali
KubeSphere
Tetrate
Kuma
Valence Security
Meshery
Cisco
Buoyant
ARMO
A service mesh is a technology that helps to manage the communication between services in microservices-based applications. It provides an additional layer of infrastructure between application services and the underlying network, allowing for better control over traffic routing and enhanced visibility into service performance. The service mesh typically consists of a data plane, which handles the actual routing of requests between services, and a management plane, which manages configuration information about the mesh.
At its core, a service mesh provides a way for application development teams to manage communication between services without having to constantly modify individual components. This is critical when building distributed systems that are comprised of many small services—as any changes made to one component can greatly affect other parts of the system. By providing an API abstraction layer that sits on top of all the services within an application architecture, developers are able to make changes to their microservices independently while still ensuring reliable communication among them.
Within this abstraction layer exists several key features that form a service mesh’s primary capabilities: service discovery, load balancing, traffic management (including rate limiting and advanced routing), security (including authentication and authorization) monitoring/observability (including logging & tracing), health checks, fault tolerance and resilience, as well as support for dynamic scaling & config updates. Service discovery allows microservices running within an application architecture to discover each other; this allows them to communicate effectively with minimal manual configuration by using “well-known” conventions such as DNS or Eureka. Load balancing facilitates efficient use of resources by distributing workloads among multiple nodes/instances; this ensures optimal utilization of compute resources without negatively affecting performance or throughput. Traffic management also plays an important role in keeping user experience smooth by controlling access rate limits & route policies; this prevents malicious bots or DDos attacks from compromising service availability. Similarly, security measures like authentication & authorization help ensure only trusted users gain access while monitoring/observability tools provide insight into how the system is performing in production so actionable insights can be gathered quickly when issues arise—allowing for more proactive troubleshooting than traditional logging solutions offer alone. Lastly, fault tolerance & resilience mechanisms guarantee system stability even when certain components fail while dynamic scaling enables quick reaction times during periods of peak usage by scaling up/down depending on demand levels.
In short, a service mesh offers organizations tremendous value when developing distributed applications via providing easier communication management across multiple microservice-based architectures along with advanced features such as secure communications, traffic optimization strategies & observability toolsets–all designed to reduce maintenance overhead costs associated with complex distributed systems and improve overall reliability & user experience levels in production environments alike.
Service meshes are becoming increasingly important in distributed architectures, providing powerful and flexible ways of managing communication between services.
As the number of microservices grow, so does the complexity of how those services communicate with one another. Managing service-to-service communication manually becomes increasingly difficult as applications and services become more complex. Service meshes provide a way to manage this complexity by providing a uniform API for service-to-service communication that can be used regardless of the underlying technology or location of the components involved in communication.
Furthermore, services meshes offer considerable flexibility when it comes to routing requests between services. This is especially useful when dealing with large numbers of services that need unified access control policies or different levels of security restrictions based on the type of data being accessed. They also provide support for fault tolerance, making it easy to configure automatic failover when necessary, as well as metric tracking capabilities which allow developers to quickly identify any performance issues arising from complex interactions between microservices.
Finally, service meshes make it easier to manage application deployments and updates as they allow developers to easily roll out new features without requiring changes to individual codebases or manual configuration changes across multiple services. Built-in testing capabilities also help ensure that an application remains stable throughout development and deployment cycles by making it possible for developers to simulate traffic behavior in different scenarios before fully releasing their code into production environments. This helps minimize unexpected issues caused by unforeseen interactions between microservices during runtime conditions.
In summary, service meshes are becoming increasingly important in distributed architectures as they provide powerful and flexible ways of managing communication between services. They allow developers to easily manage application deployments and updates while minimizing unexpected issues caused by unforeseen interactions between microservices in production environments. Furthermore, their routing capabilities, fault tolerance support, and built-in testing functionality offer considerable added value for organizations investing in microservice architectures.
The cost of a service mesh depends on many factors. Generally speaking, the services provided by service meshes can range from free to extremely expensive. For example, some open source solutions are freely available and can be implemented with minimal costs associated such as network infrastructure and personnel time to set up the mesh. On the other hand, managed services such as Istio or App Mesh tend to offer more advanced features but come with cloud provider fees for their usage. If you’re looking for something robust with support for production workloads, then these options may be worth considering at a premium price point. Additionally, most cloud providers will calculate usage based on requests and there may also be additional costs associated with specific features like authentication or encryption services when using a service mesh.
Overall, it’s important to assess your organization's needs before selecting a service mesh solution that best fits within your budget constraints. With careful consideration of the company’s requirements and an understanding of how pricing models work across different solutions, organizations should be able to make an informed decision in terms of cost without sacrificing quality of service or security concerns associated with deploying in production environments.
When using a service mesh, there are several risks to consider:
Software that can integrate with service meshes generally falls into two categories: applications and infrastructure. Applications such as microservices, APIs, and web services are able to use the features of a service mesh for communication routing, load balancing, service discovery, identity management, observability (metrics/logs), etc.
Infrastructure components like container orchestration systems, such as Kubernetes or Istio sidecars can also leverage the features of a service mesh directly to help ensure secure communications between different parts of the distributed application. In both cases, integration with a service mesh allows applications and services to be more resilient and easily configurable in complex distributed architectures.